Hi Marcio, not sure what you want to do. A possible change would be to render the areoway=* at level 1 and higher. I think the typ file is the better solution. Gerd From: thundercel@gpsinfo.com.br To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:58:03 -0300 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation Yes Gerd, Without a typ file it has a higher priority, but we use the defaul the Mkgmap TYP and did not intend to date to develop a custom TYP. Have some form of the Mkgmap level make him take that priority polygon used for airport or aerodrome? Marcio From: Gerd Petermann Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:38 AM To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation Hi Marcio, yes, I found similar results. Without a typ file, the 0x07 polygon seems to have the higher draw priority. Gerd From: thundercel@gpsinfo.com.br To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:35:30 -0300 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation Hi Gerd, assisting Nelson, using the default style we have ever encountered the first problem is the style does not look landuse = grass forcing us to include in inc / landuse_polygons line landuse = grass [0x17 resolution 20]. Using the default style (with grass included) we only have succeeded using the "comment out" in the following polygons lines of "default style": :# aeroway=airport [0x07 resolution 20] # aeroway=aerodrome [0x07 resolution 20] Marcio _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev