Hi Marcio,

not sure what you want to do. A possible change would be to render
the areoway=* at level 1 and higher. I think the typ file is the better solution.

Gerd


From: thundercel@gpsinfo.com.br
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:58:03 -0300
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation

Yes Gerd,
Without a typ file it has a higher priority, but we use the defaul the Mkgmap TYP and did not intend to date to develop a custom TYP.
Have some form of the Mkgmap level make him take that priority polygon used for airport or aerodrome?
 
Marcio
 
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation
 
Hi Marcio,

yes, I found similar results. Without a typ file, the 0x07 polygon seems to have the higher draw priority.

Gerd


From: thundercel@gpsinfo.com.br
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:35:30 -0300
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation

Hi Gerd,
assisting Nelson, using the default style we have ever encountered the first problem is the style does not look landuse = grass forcing us to include in inc / landuse_polygons line landuse = grass [0x17 resolution 20].
Using the default style (with grass included) we only have succeeded using the "comment out" in the following polygons lines of "default style":
 
:# aeroway=airport [0x07 resolution 20]
# aeroway=aerodrome [0x07 resolution 20]
 
Marcio
 
 

_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev