Hi, yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type. What bug do you mean? Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00 when used in the lines or polygons file? Gerd
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800 From: osm@pinns.co.uk To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles
Hi
Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.
It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I didn't use in my TYP file.
invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE
It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is correctly identified as valid. I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero subtypes.
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev