Hi,
yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type.
What bug do you mean?
Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00
when used in the lines or polygons file?
Gerd
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800
> From: osm@pinns.co.uk
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles
>
> Hi
>
> Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.
>
> It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I didn't use in
> my TYP file.
>
> invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE
>
> It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is
> correctly identified as valid.
> I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero subtypes.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev