As there are clearly differences in features supported by various models, would it maybe be an idea to externalise the differences in some way? How about a file to contain the capabilities of device types, an option to target a particular entry in that file, and a way to expose the selected device in the style files? That could also help address the differences in supported POI categories and icons. Colin On 2014-05-11 11:52, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Minko,
thanks for your help. This is now implemented with r3269.
Gerd
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:45:47 +0200 From: ligfietser@online.nl To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
what about 0xa ? Or was that meant to be 0x1a ?
Hi Gerd
0x0a gives also a routing error, so everything in the range 0x01-0x13, 0x16 and 0x1b _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev [1]
Links: ------ [1] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev