As there are clearly differences in features supported by various models, would it maybe be an idea to externalise the differences in some way? How about a file to contain the capabilities of device types, an option to target a particular entry in that file, and a way to expose the selected device in the style files? That could also help address the differences in supported POI categories and icons.

Colin

On 2014-05-11 11:52, Gerd Petermann wrote:

Hi Minko,

thanks for your help. This is now implemented with r3269.

Gerd

> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:45:47 +0200
> From: ligfietser@online.nl
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
>
> > what about 0xa ? Or was that meant to be 0x1a ?
>
> Hi Gerd
>
> 0x0a gives also a routing error, so everything in the range
> 0x01-0x13, 0x16 and 0x1b
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev