gerd what do you think of this general rule mkgmap:country admin level 5 then mkgmap:state admin level 6 mkgmap:region admin level 7 postcode sdmin level 8 suburb level 9, 10 would that be a good idea for general rules , to give definition ? Stephen On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 8:16 PM, GerdP <gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Stephen,
no idea what "doing admin_level 3" means. The tags mkgmap:admin_level2 - 11 may be set when the bounds option is used. The values are taken from the corresponding administrative boundaries. See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#admin_level
Gerd
steve sgalowski wrote
when you do admin_level 3 and level 5 what is the difference in what it displays , and what if any size difference is there ? stephen
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenchen@
wrote:
Hi Stephen,
no idea what you mean.
Gerd
------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 19:25:53 +1000 From:
steve.sgalowski@
To:
mkgmap-dev@.org
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] superfluous country specific rules in inc/address?
gerd P and list I just have one main big question
you talk about the admin level 3 - 11 ok in the style document but under each level, what is showen or displayed , under here
would i be able to aquire clarification on this .
Stephen
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenchen@
wrote:
Hi Stephen,
look at the default style file inc/address, it is contained in the dist package. You can also watch it in the SVN repository:
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=mkgmap&path=%2Ftrunk...
< http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=mkgmap&path=/trunk/r...
It doesn't contain any specific rules for Australia. If you think it should please suggest changes.
Gerd
------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 17:40:50 +1000 From:
steve.sgalowski@
To:
mkgmap-dev@.org
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] superfluous country specific rules in inc/address?
how can i test this gerd , with the autralia region
is there any country specific rules for POI
Stephen
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenchen@
wrote:
Hi all,
Please check my post
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-adresses-for-3-french-cities-tp5847140p...
I don't know why we have so many country specific rules which seem to do the same as the last "general" rules to set mkgmap:city and mkgmap:region.
I'd prefer to reduce the country specific rules so that it is clear
which
countries do not use mkgmap:admin_level8 for city and mkgmap:admin_level6 for region.
Comments?
Gerd
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/superfluous-country-specific-rules-in-inc-add... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev