Hi Thorsten, I think we can skip the logs, the different file sizes are intended. (as long as you see smaller files with r277) See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-relations-to-be-checked-with-keep-co... regarding the changes suggested by WanMil. I don't know why this results in more mkgmap errors. Please send me a link to the two different 71200148.osm.pbf files and let me know the parms for mkgmap and the version of mkgmap you are using. Gerd
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:25:32 +0100 From: kukuk@suse.de To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, GerdP wrote:
Thorsten Kukuk wrote
Where there any changes which let expect such a result?
Well, most changes were optimizations, but some also change the output, r277 compared to r270: - keep-complete is the default - Changes suggested by WanMil to reduce the number of problem candidates - different handling of polygon files
Do you see different areas.list files or just different output files? Please send me the logs of both versions for detailed analyses.
No difference in areas.list or densities-out.txt, but the output files are much smaller.
I will send the output later.
Thorsten
-- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev