I think we can skip the logs, the different file sizes are intended.
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-relations-to-be-checked-with-keep-complete-true-tp5740576p5741093.html
regarding the changes suggested by WanMil.
I don't know why this results in more mkgmap errors. Please send me a link to the two different
71200148.osm.pbf files and let me know the parms for mkgmap and the version of mkgmap
you are using.
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:25:32 +0100
> From: kukuk@suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, GerdP wrote:
>
> > Thorsten Kukuk wrote
> > > Where there any changes which let expect such a result?
> >
> > Well, most changes were optimizations, but some also change the output,
> > r277 compared to r270:
> > - keep-complete is the default
> > - Changes suggested by WanMil to reduce the number of problem candidates
> > - different handling of polygon files
> >
> > Do you see different areas.list files or just different output files?
> > Please send me the logs of both versions for detailed analyses.
>
> No difference in areas.list or densities-out.txt, but the output files
> are much smaller.
>
> I will send the output later.
>
> Thorsten
>
> --
> Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev