data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32443/324435eb3f30fe4d214d73b3a2d9147a24f9f11a" alt=""
Good drawing, that's exactly what I meant. Still I'm not totally convinced. If both E and e do have a motorway_junction node, why shouldn't the code be applied to both motorway_links? Now I saw the typical Garmin behaviour on e to show the name of the lower grade road at the end of the motorway_link, which wasn't very informative. Cherio, Johan 2012/12/21 WanMil <wmgcnfg@web.de>
This afternoon in live testing I found what seems to be a bug. Exits from a parallel lane, tagged as motorway_link, didn't show up with the exit_hint. Maybe the code does not know to which motorway_link of the y-branch the exit_hint has to be put on. Is it possible to assign the exit_hint to the motorway_link which is going to the right?
I set the exit_hint only on exits directly from motorways because hints on parallel lines should be created from the destination tags.
So have a look on the following junction:
===E==================================== \ / -------e---------------------- \ \destination=Berlin
=== motorway --- motorway_link E exit node on motorway e exit node on motorway_link
So and exit_hint is created only for E because after you have passed E the Garmin should tell you the correct destination which is usually written on the signs in the motorway junction (in Germany...). If an exit hint would also be created for e you would see the destination only after passing e and that's too late. The motorway junctions if have analyzed did have the same tags on E and e so there is no additional information.
WanMil _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev