data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hallo Herr Samadi, ich hoffe, Ihnen geht es wieder besser. Machen Sie bitte neue Terminvorschläge. mfg Gerd Petermann
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:05:00 +0200 From: marko.makela@iki.fi To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Suppressing dead-end-checks for parking entrance/exit
Hi Gerd,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:11:25AM +0100, Gerd Petermann wrote:
attached is version 2 of the patch which checks only first and last node of a road.
Thanks! I finally tested this, and it looked OK with my fabricated data and style file patch, which did { add fixme=yes } to some nodes.
Please check: I think the code in RouteNode.reportDeadEnds() does not report a dead end oneway if the routeNode contains a normal (twoway) road because both flags noWayOut and noWayIn are set to false in this case. Is this intended?
I did not implement the dead-end checks. I believe it was Mark Burton, who no longer is active in the project. Can you draw ASCII art of the situation? For example, using the following legend:
= means two-way road
means one-way road | means dead-end
The cases |==== or ====| should not emit any warning; these should be common for highway=residential and highway=service etc.
====>>>>>| should emit a warning 'goes nowhere' ====<<<<<| should emit a warning 'comes from nowhere' ====>>>>>==== no warning ====<<<<<==== no warning
This is my reasoning; I did not test the actual behaviour. Which case did you have in mind?
Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev