> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:05:00 +0200
> From: marko.makela@iki.fi
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Suppressing dead-end-checks for parking entrance/exit
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:11:25AM +0100, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> >attached is version 2 of the patch which checks only first and last
> >node of a road.
>
> Thanks! I finally tested this, and it looked OK with my fabricated data
> and style file patch, which did { add fixme=yes } to some nodes.
>
> >Please check:
> >I think the code in RouteNode.reportDeadEnds() does not report a dead
> >end oneway if the routeNode contains a normal (twoway) road because
> >both flags noWayOut and noWayIn are set to false in this case. Is this
> >intended?
>
> I did not implement the dead-end checks. I believe it was Mark Burton,
> who no longer is active in the project. Can you draw ASCII art of the
> situation? For example, using the following legend:
>
> = means two-way road
> > means one-way road
> | means dead-end
>
> The cases |==== or ====| should not emit any warning; these should be
> common for highway=residential and highway=service etc.
>
> ====>>>>>| should emit a warning 'goes nowhere'
> ====<<<<<| should emit a warning 'comes from nowhere'
> ====>>>>>==== no warning
> ====<<<<<==== no warning
>
> This is my reasoning; I did not test the actual behaviour. Which case
> did you have in mind?
>
> Marko
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev