But does it mean semi_connected or unconnected? I would like to have both as option if possible. On 18 September 2017 at 21:22, Gerd Petermann < gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
what do you think about a tag named mkgmap:remove-if-no-road=yes ? I would add code to check all non-routable lines for this tag. If no routable line is found for the same OSM way the line is removed. This check is performed after the processing of the 2 mkgmap:set_xxx_type tags and maybe other routines which remove routable lines because they are too short etc.
Gerd
Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
3. I'm fine with another name - maybe mkgmap:set_semi_connected_ line=none and mkgmap:set_unconnected_line=none? Well I actually already went through my style and added mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none - I'm just missing the overlays also being removed as explained to fully use it. I actually had not noticed that mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none did not remove all the lines that I intended to be removed by it because I never properly checked it using a test file - and there are not many unconnected ways in real OSM data (while there are far more semi_connected lines/ways). Actually I think it should be semiconnected as we alo use unconnected and not un_connected (even though it is two words in proper spelling).
-- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org Schusterbergweg 32/8 6020 Innsbruck Austria - Österreich