But does it mean semi_connected or unconnected? I would like to have both as option if possible.

On 18 September 2017 at 21:22, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

what do you think about a tag named mkgmap:remove-if-no-road=yes ?
I would add code to check all non-routable lines for this tag.
If no routable line is found for the same OSM way the line is removed.
This check is performed after the processing of the 2 mkgmap:set_xxx_type
tags
and maybe other routines which remove routable lines because they are too
short
etc.

Gerd


Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
> 3. I'm fine with another name - maybe mkgmap:set_semi_connected_line=none
> and mkgmap:set_unconnected_line=none?
> Well I actually already went through my style and added
> mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none - I'm just missing the overlays also
> being removed as explained to fully use it. I actually had not noticed
> that
> mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none did not remove all the lines that I
> intended to be removed by it because I never properly checked it using a
> test file - and there are not many unconnected ways in real OSM data
> (while
> there are far more semi_connected lines/ways). Actually I think it should
> be semiconnected as we alo use unconnected and not un_connected (even
> though it is two words in proper spelling).








--
Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org
Schusterbergweg 32/8
6020 Innsbruck
Austria - Österreich