November 2011 - mkgmap-dev - The mkgmap lists

Why does splitter limit the number of threads?
by GerdP 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Hello list, the current implementation limits the number of threads to the number of available cores. I changed the code to allow +2 threads. This results in a much better throughput on my dual core machine (e.g. germany.osm.pbf is 100 seconds or 17% faster) with r190 + patchv7. What could be the reason for this limit? ciao, Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Why-does-splitter-limit-the-number-of-threa… Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 4

mkgmap-gmap-hdr ClassCastException
by Francisco Moraes 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Tried the new mkgmap with --index support for --gmapsupp but I hit the following: java.lang.ClassCastException: uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.srt.SrtSortKey incompatible with uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.srt.MultiSortKey at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.srt.MultiSortKey.compareTo(MultiSortKey.java:38) Francisco

2 1

[TeamCity, SUCCESSFUL] Build mkgmap::trunk build #2128-1137
by teamcity＠mkgmap.org.uk 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Build mkgmap::trunk build #2128-1137 successful (tests passed: 205). Agent: Iocaste Build results: http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/viewLog.html?buildId=3811&buildTypeId=bt2 Changes included (1 change) ==================================================== Change 2128 by steve (5 files): And another test fix... see more information about changed files: http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/viewLog.html?tab=buildChangesDiv&buildId=3811… ============================================================================ Configure email notifications: http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/profile.html?init=1&tab=userNotifications

1 0

Commit: r2128: And another test fix...
by svn commit 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Version 2128 was commited by steve on 2011-11-28 11:18:38 +0000 (Mon, 28 Nov 2011) And another test fix...

1 0

[TeamCity, FAILED] Build mkgmap::trunk build #2127-1135
by teamcity＠mkgmap.org.uk 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Build mkgmap::trunk build #2127-1135 failed (tests failed: 1 (1 new), passed: 204). Agent: Iocaste Build results: http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/viewLog.html?buildId=3809&buildTypeId=bt2 Failed Tests Summary: Newly failed tests (1 test, alphabetically ordered) ================================================================== func.route.SimpleRouteTest.testSize Newly failed tests details (naturally ordered) ================================================================== func.route.SimpleRouteTest.testSize (new) ================= junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: LBL size expected:<27645> but was:<27647> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618) at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443) at func.route.SimpleRouteTest.testSize(SimpleRouteTest.java:63) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220) at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:422) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:931) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:785) Changes included (2 changes) ==================================================== Change 2127 by steve (1 file): And a test fix since the previous commit changed the size of the TRE file. Change 2126 by steve (3 files): Add a copyright and license-file options for cases where you are not using osm data and the input file format does not contain copyright information. --Thorsten Kukuk see more information about changed files: http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/viewLog.html?tab=buildChangesDiv&buildId=3809… ============================================================================ Configure email notifications: http://teamcity.mkgmap.org.uk/profile.html?init=1&tab=userNotifications

1 0

Commit: r2127: And a test fix since the previous commit changed the size of the TRE file.
by svn commit 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Version 2127 was commited by steve on 2011-11-28 11:11:22 +0000 (Mon, 28 Nov 2011) And a test fix since the previous commit changed the size of the TRE file.

1 0

Commit: r2126: Add a copyright and license-file options for cases where you are not using osm data and
by svn commit 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Version 2126 was commited by steve on 2011-11-28 11:09:47 +0000 (Mon, 28 Nov 2011) Add a copyright and license-file options for cases where you are not using osm data and the input file format does not contain copyright information. --Thorsten Kukuk

1 0

Location not working in trunk default style
by Steve Ratcliffe 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Hi I discovered that the location tags (mkgmap:city and so on) are not working in the default style and the reason involves the way that base-style works. It prepends the rules in the current style before the rules in the base style. This allows rules in the current style to override rules in the base-style as you would expect. However, if you have an action-only rule then it will never be seen if a real rule in the current style matches first. So putting all the location actions in a base-style does not work. Solutions? My ideas: First in the particular case of location, address and perhaps access tags I think that they should be separate file(s). The very fact that the same rules are repeated in lines, points and polygons, strongly indicates that they should be separated. They could be placed in one file, which would be used by each of the different geometry types. Second, perhaps there is a need for two commands include-before and include-after which allow you to do the inclusion either way as appropriate for the situation. ..Steve

4 5

side effects add-pois-to-lines
by Minko 27 Nov '11

27 Nov '11

If this option is enabled, there are unwanted side effects. For instance if someone accidently tagged a highway with barrier=gate, every node on this highway gets a gate symbol. If I want to change this behaviour I have to put on almost every poi line the statement & mkgmap:line2poi!=true Is it possible to turn this around? That if I DO want to see this poi, I put & mkgmap:line2poi=true in the rule? Something like this: route=ferry & opening_hours=* & mkgmap:line2poi=true & mkgmap:line2poitype=mid {name '${name} (${opening_hours})' | 'operating ${opening_hours}' } [0x6406 resolution 24]

8 15

2 question about --gmapsupp
by ValentinAK 23 Nov '11

23 Nov '11

1. How can I add a search index information in GMAPSUPP.IMG with option "--gmapsupp" (idx section)? 2. How can I change Mapset name to my custom? Now it is taken from the name of the last tile. ----- http://maptourist.org/ -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/2-question-about-gmapsupp-tp6988221p6988221… Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 3