On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:36:10 +0100, Michael Prinzing wrote:

2.) File containing contour data cannot be processed ----------------------------------------------------

The problem that the splitter did not finish with only a single thread is solved now, but the problem with the splitter crashing on some data still exists. I could track it down to a very simple example. When I am trying to split the following data: ------------------------------------------------------ <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <osm version="0.6" generator="Osmosis 0.38"> <node id="2073742179" version="1" timestamp="2011-03-03T22:05:10Z" lat="50.8776211" lon="6.0933333"/> <node id="2073742180" version="1" timestamp="2011-03-03T22:05:10Z" lat="50.88" lon="6.0969358"/> <node id="2073742181" version="1" timestamp="2011-03-03T22:05:10Z" lat="50.8859414" lon="6.1066667"/> <node id="2073742182" version="1" timestamp="2011-03-03T22:05:10Z" lat="50.8922471" lon="6.12"/> <node id="2073742183" version="1" timestamp="2011-03-03T22:05:10Z" lat="50.8933333" lon="6.1235571"/> <way id="2000000000" version="1" timestamp="2011-03-03T22:05:10Z"> <nd ref="2073742179"/> <nd ref="2073742180"/> <nd ref="2073742181"/> <nd ref="2073742182"/> <nd ref="2073742183"/> <tag k="contour" v="elevation"/> <tag k="contour_ext" v="medium"/> <tag k="level" v="5"/> <tag k="ele" v="200"/> </way> </osm> ------------------------------------------------------ I am getting the following: ------------------------------------------------------ java -jar splitter.jar test.osm cache= description= geonames-file= legacy-mode=false mapid=63240001 max-areas=255 max-nodes=1600000 max-threads=1 (auto) mixed=false no-trim=false output-dir= overlap=2000 resolution=13 split-file= status-freq=120 write-kml= Elapsed time: 0s Memory: Current 15MB (1MB used, 14MB free) Max 247MB Time started: Fri Mar 04 02:32:06 CET 2011 Map is being split for resolution 13: - area boundaries are aligned to 0x800 map units - areas are multiples of 0x1000 map units wide and high Processing test.osm in 1 file Time: Fri Mar 04 02:32:06 CET 2011 Exact map coverage is (50.87762117385864,6.093313694000244) to (50.89332818984985,6.123547554016113) Trimmed and rounded map coverage is (50.888671875,6.064453125) to (50.9765625,6.15234375) Splitting nodes into areas containing a maximum of 1.600.000 nodes each... Area (50.888671875,6.064453125) to (50.9765625,6.15234375) contains 2 nodes. DONE! 1 areas: Area 63240001 covers (0x243000,0x45000) to (0x244000,0x46000) Writing out split osm files Fri Mar 04 02:32:06 CET 2011 Processing 1 areas in a single pass Starting pass 1 of 1, processing 1 areas (63240001 to 63240001) Making SparseMultiMap Making SparseMultiMap Processing test.osm Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Start index (-30655339) is negative at it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.Arrays.ensureFromTo(Arrays.java:45) at it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.objects.ObjectArrays.ensureFromTo(ObjectArrays.jav a:351) at it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.objects.ObjectArrays.fill(ObjectArrays.java:313) at it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.objects.ObjectArrayList.size(ObjectArrayList.java: 308) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.SparseInt2ShortMapInline.resizeTo(SparseInt2Shor tMapInline.java:96) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.SparseInt2ShortMapInline.put(SparseInt2ShortMapI nline.java:123) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.SparseInt2ShortMultiMap$Inner.put(SparseInt2Shor tMultiMap.java:81) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.SparseInt2ShortMultiMap.put(SparseInt2ShortMulti Map.java:31) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.SplitProcessor.writeNode(SplitProcessor.java:209 ) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.SplitProcessor.processNode(SplitProcessor.java:1 18) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.OSMParser.endElement(OSMParser.java:243) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.AbstractXppParser.parse(AbstractXppParser.java:5 7) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.processMap(Main.java:399) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.writeAreas(Main.java:355) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.split(Main.java:188) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.start(Main.java:116) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.main(Main.java:105) ------------------------------------------------------ Is there a limit for Node-IDs and Way-IDs lower than 2^32 that was introduced after r161? Michael