Since mkgmap r4092 I get errors like "Missing part: 0 of GARMIN .RGN in IMG-file" or "Missing part: 0 of ~�?�.�� in IMG-file" when I use gmapi-builder.py to transform maps to gmap format. r4091 works fine with gmapi-builder. Resulting *.gmapi folder is almost empty with r4092 and above.
Hi Carlos, maybe gmapi-builder.py cannot handle block sizes <> 512? Why do you that tool and not the --gmapi option ? Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam@orangecorreo.es> Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Februar 2018 19:40 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with gmapi-builder Since mkgmap r4092 I get errors like "Missing part: 0 of GARMIN .RGN in IMG-file" or "Missing part: 0 of ~�?�.�� in IMG-file" when I use gmapi-builder.py to transform maps to gmap format. r4091 works fine with gmapi-builder. Resulting *.gmapi folder is almost empty with r4092 and above. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Gerd When mkgmap added --gmapi option I did some test and found that mkgmap (without --gmapi)+gmapi-builder was a little faster than mkgmap with --gmapi, that's why I continued using gmapi-builder. Perhaps it's time to change my toolchain (I alredy did for DEM maps) El 09/02/18 a las 19:43, Gerd Petermann escribió:
Hi Carlos,
maybe gmapi-builder.py cannot handle block sizes <> 512? Why do you that tool and not the --gmapi option ?
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam@orangecorreo.es> Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Februar 2018 19:40 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with gmapi-builder
Since mkgmap r4092 I get errors like "Missing part: 0 of GARMIN .RGN in IMG-file" or "Missing part: 0 of ~�?�.�� in IMG-file" when I use gmapi-builder.py to transform maps to gmap format. r4091 works fine with gmapi-builder. Resulting *.gmapi folder is almost empty with r4092 and above.
participants (2)
-
Carlos Dávila -
Gerd Petermann