Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also)
Gents, I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp I've tried different versions of options but I do not get the overview maps working with --gmapi. BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself. Here the call of mkgmap and its output: java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ? Thanks for helping Patrik
Hi Patrik, I did not yet try to reproduce the problem. What jumps into my mind first is that the previously computed overview map is not found with the argument 6442*.img. Or maybe you have to specify option --tdbfile to get an overview map. If that doesn't help please post also the 1st command. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Patrik Brunner <patrik.brunner@gmx.net> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017 16:20:08 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also) Gents, I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp I've tried different versions of options but I do not get the overview maps working with --gmapi. BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself. Here the call of mkgmap and its output: java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ? Thanks for helping Patrik
Gerd, Sorry for the delay. I've also tried it with --tdbfile and it didn't help. I can post the 1st command probably tomorrow. I can just state the following about the outcome of the 1st command: - the option --tdbfile is used and proper overview name and map are set too - the outcome of the 1st command definitely contains the overviewmap properly, if I install the result from the first command into BaseCamp via registry I see the overviewmap. Cheers Patrik On 06.02.2017 09:28, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Patrik,
I did not yet try to reproduce the problem. What jumps into my mind first is that the previously computed overview map is not found with the argument 6442*.img. Or maybe you have to specify option --tdbfile to get an overview map.
If that doesn't help please post also the 1st command.
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Patrik Brunner <patrik.brunner@gmx.net> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017 16:20:08 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also)
Gents,
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
I've tried different versions of options but I do not get the overview maps working with --gmapi.
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should not do that. ..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Steve, Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli. It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the overview parameters (--overview-mapname=... --overview-mapnumber=...), in no case I have overview maps. The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names. Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options... Cheers Patrik On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should not do that.
..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Patrik
Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli.
I'm sorry but I still do not understand the problem. If you create a map normally and then convert it with the garmin converter does that gmapi map work? The same map converted with mkgmap --gmapi, you are saying does not work. So if the first one works, but the second doesn't, then there must be a difference between the two maps. The only differences I know of are: 1. We do not create the top level osmmap.gmapi directory. 2. There are differences in the white space in the Info.xml file. Or there is a difference in your case that I am not aware of. If the problem is the first, then it is easy enough to fix. I can't believe that it is the second, but you never know.. If there is another difference I need to know what it is. If you could create a small map that does not work that you could upload that would be helpful. ..Steve
It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the overview parameters (--overview-mapname=... --overview-mapnumber=...), in no case I have overview maps. The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names.
Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options...
Cheers Patrik
On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should not do that.
..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Steve, in the process of building all different flavors of map (imagedir, gmapsupp, gmapi) first the img files are built and afterward collected together. The creation is done by calling mkgmap as follows (cfg file attached): java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 -c Freizeitkarte_LUX.cfg --check-styles Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:07:23 CET 2017 Found one style in D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/work/Freizeitkarte_LUX_fr/style/fzk finished check-styles Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:08:04 CET 2017 Total time taken: 40429ms After the the result is ok, the resulting map shown in BaseCamp (images installed via Registry) does show the overview map. As far as I know the overview map (as well as the flag to show the heigth profiles) are stored in the tdb file, correct ? Later in the normal process I call jmc_cli to convert the images into gmapi format. This does not seem to screw the overview map (inside the tdb file put into the gmap folder structure) and also shows the height profiles. But if I use the new functionality of mkgmap to convert the images into gmapi format the height profiles and the overview map got lost. The tdb and some other files (map files, but not the tile files) have a new change time. The missing heigth profiles could be fixed by just adding --show-profiles=1 to the call, but I was not able to get the overview map running. The actual call is: java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --overview-mapname="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --overview-mapnumber=64420000 --product-version="1702" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:22:06 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:22:08 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1702ms I was also trying to call it without the overview options which results also in a map without overview map, but just with different (default) filenames inside the gmap directory structure. Calling it without --tdbfile also didn't help. Any ideas ? Am I doing something wrong due to lack of understanding or does mkgmap behave wrongly ? Thanks and regards Patrik On 08.02.2017 11:42, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli.
I'm sorry but I still do not understand the problem.
If you create a map normally and then convert it with the garmin converter does that gmapi map work?
The same map converted with mkgmap --gmapi, you are saying does not work.
So if the first one works, but the second doesn't, then there must be a difference between the two maps.
The only differences I know of are:
1. We do not create the top level osmmap.gmapi directory. 2. There are differences in the white space in the Info.xml file.
Or there is a difference in your case that I am not aware of.
If the problem is the first, then it is easy enough to fix. I can't believe that it is the second, but you never know..
If there is another difference I need to know what it is. If you could create a small map that does not work that you could upload that would be helpful.
..Steve
It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the overview parameters (--overview-mapname=... --overview-mapnumber=...), in no case I have overview maps. The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names.
Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options...
Cheers Patrik
On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should not do that.
..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar
--max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Patrik, I think the overview map might be missing because your cfg file contains option remove-ovm-work-files I guess the --gmapi option doesn't try to find/identify an existing overview map. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Patrik Brunner <patrik.brunner@gmx.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017 21:33:53 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also) Steve, in the process of building all different flavors of map (imagedir, gmapsupp, gmapi) first the img files are built and afterward collected together. The creation is done by calling mkgmap as follows (cfg file attached): java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 -c Freizeitkarte_LUX.cfg --check-styles Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:07:23 CET 2017 Found one style in D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/work/Freizeitkarte_LUX_fr/style/fzk finished check-styles Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:08:04 CET 2017 Total time taken: 40429ms After the the result is ok, the resulting map shown in BaseCamp (images installed via Registry) does show the overview map. As far as I know the overview map (as well as the flag to show the heigth profiles) are stored in the tdb file, correct ? Later in the normal process I call jmc_cli to convert the images into gmapi format. This does not seem to screw the overview map (inside the tdb file put into the gmap folder structure) and also shows the height profiles. But if I use the new functionality of mkgmap to convert the images into gmapi format the height profiles and the overview map got lost. The tdb and some other files (map files, but not the tile files) have a new change time. The missing heigth profiles could be fixed by just adding --show-profiles=1 to the call, but I was not able to get the overview map running. The actual call is: java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --overview-mapname="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --overview-mapnumber=64420000 --product-version="1702" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:22:06 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:22:08 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1702ms I was also trying to call it without the overview options which results also in a map without overview map, but just with different (default) filenames inside the gmap directory structure. Calling it without --tdbfile also didn't help. Any ideas ? Am I doing something wrong due to lack of understanding or does mkgmap behave wrongly ? Thanks and regards Patrik On 08.02.2017 11:42, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli.
I'm sorry but I still do not understand the problem.
If you create a map normally and then convert it with the garmin converter does that gmapi map work?
The same map converted with mkgmap --gmapi, you are saying does not work.
So if the first one works, but the second doesn't, then there must be a difference between the two maps.
The only differences I know of are:
1. We do not create the top level osmmap.gmapi directory. 2. There are differences in the white space in the Info.xml file.
Or there is a difference in your case that I am not aware of.
If the problem is the first, then it is easy enough to fix. I can't believe that it is the second, but you never know..
If there is another difference I need to know what it is. If you could create a small map that does not work that you could upload that would be helpful.
..Steve
It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the overview parameters (--overview-mapname=... --overview-mapnumber=...), in no case I have overview maps. The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names.
Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options...
Cheers Patrik
On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should not do that.
..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar
--max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Yes good point that is likely the problem. Creating the overview map is a second stage thing Steve On 8 February 2017 20:40:07 GMT+00:00, Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Patrik,
I think the overview map might be missing because your cfg file contains option remove-ovm-work-files I guess the --gmapi option doesn't try to find/identify an existing overview map.
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Patrik Brunner <patrik.brunner@gmx.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017 21:33:53 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also)
Steve,
in the process of building all different flavors of map (imagedir, gmapsupp, gmapi) first the img files are built and afterward collected together. The creation is done by calling mkgmap as follows (cfg file attached):
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 -c Freizeitkarte_LUX.cfg --check-styles Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:07:23 CET 2017 Found one style in D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/work/Freizeitkarte_LUX_fr/style/fzk finished check-styles Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:08:04 CET 2017 Total time taken: 40429ms
After the the result is ok, the resulting map shown in BaseCamp (images installed via Registry) does show the overview map. As far as I know the overview map (as well as the flag to show the heigth profiles) are stored in the tdb file, correct ?
Later in the normal process I call jmc_cli to convert the images into gmapi format. This does not seem to screw the overview map (inside the tdb file put into the gmap folder structure) and also shows the height profiles.
But if I use the new functionality of mkgmap to convert the images into gmapi format the height profiles and the overview map got lost. The tdb and some other files (map files, but not the tile files) have a new change time. The missing heigth profiles could be fixed by just adding --show-profiles=1 to the call, but I was not able to get the overview map running. The actual call is:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --overview-mapname="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --overview-mapnumber=64420000 --product-version="1702" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:22:06 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:22:08 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1702ms
I was also trying to call it without the overview options which results also in a map without overview map, but just with different (default) filenames inside the gmap directory structure. Calling it without --tdbfile also didn't help.
Any ideas ? Am I doing something wrong due to lack of understanding or does mkgmap behave wrongly ?
Thanks and regards Patrik
On 08.02.2017 11:42, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli.
I'm sorry but I still do not understand the problem.
If you create a map normally and then convert it with the garmin converter does that gmapi map work?
The same map converted with mkgmap --gmapi, you are saying does not work.
So if the first one works, but the second doesn't, then there must be a difference between the two maps.
The only differences I know of are:
1. We do not create the top level osmmap.gmapi directory. 2. There are differences in the white space in the Info.xml file.
Or there is a difference in your case that I am not aware of.
If the problem is the first, then it is easy enough to fix. I can't believe that it is the second, but you never know..
If there is another difference I need to know what it is. If you could create a small map that does not work that you could upload that would be helpful.
..Steve
It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the overview parameters (--overview-mapname=...
--overview-mapnumber=...),
in no case I have overview maps. The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names.
Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options...
Cheers Patrik
On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should not do that.
..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar
D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar
--max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Bingo !! Gerd, you nailed it down. Was something easy to test and the result is that I now also have proper overview map in the gmap created by mkgmap ! Great, many thanks for your help and the hint/solution. Sorry for the 'false' alarm.... the problem was, unfortunately that happens often, the 'thing' between the monitor and the back of the chair, the enduser... ;-) Cheers Patrik On 08.02.2017 21:40, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Patrik,
I think the overview map might be missing because your cfg file contains option remove-ovm-work-files I guess the --gmapi option doesn't try to find/identify an existing overview map.
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Patrik Brunner <patrik.brunner@gmx.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017 21:33:53 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also)
Steve,
in the process of building all different flavors of map (imagedir, gmapsupp, gmapi) first the img files are built and afterward collected together. The creation is done by calling mkgmap as follows (cfg file attached):
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 -c Freizeitkarte_LUX.cfg --check-styles Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:07:23 CET 2017 Found one style in D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/work/Freizeitkarte_LUX_fr/style/fzk finished check-styles Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:08:04 CET 2017 Total time taken: 40429ms
After the the result is ok, the resulting map shown in BaseCamp (images installed via Registry) does show the overview map. As far as I know the overview map (as well as the flag to show the heigth profiles) are stored in the tdb file, correct ?
Later in the normal process I call jmc_cli to convert the images into gmapi format. This does not seem to screw the overview map (inside the tdb file put into the gmap folder structure) and also shows the height profiles.
But if I use the new functionality of mkgmap to convert the images into gmapi format the height profiles and the overview map got lost. The tdb and some other files (map files, but not the tile files) have a new change time. The missing heigth profiles could be fixed by just adding --show-profiles=1 to the call, but I was not able to get the overview map running. The actual call is:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --overview-mapname="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --overview-mapnumber=64420000 --product-version="1702" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Wed Feb 08 21:22:06 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Wed Feb 08 21:22:08 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1702ms
I was also trying to call it without the overview options which results also in a map without overview map, but just with different (default) filenames inside the gmap directory structure. Calling it without --tdbfile also didn't help.
Any ideas ? Am I doing something wrong due to lack of understanding or does mkgmap behave wrongly ?
Thanks and regards Patrik
On 08.02.2017 11:42, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli. I'm sorry but I still do not understand the problem.
If you create a map normally and then convert it with the garmin converter does that gmapi map work?
The same map converted with mkgmap --gmapi, you are saying does not work.
So if the first one works, but the second doesn't, then there must be a difference between the two maps.
The only differences I know of are:
1. We do not create the top level osmmap.gmapi directory. 2. There are differences in the white space in the Info.xml file.
Or there is a difference in your case that I am not aware of.
If the problem is the first, then it is easy enough to fix. I can't believe that it is the second, but you never know..
If there is another difference I need to know what it is. If you could create a small map that does not work that you could upload that would be helpful.
..Steve
It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the overview parameters (--overview-mapname=... --overview-mapnumber=...), in no case I have overview maps. The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names.
Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options...
Cheers Patrik
On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work properly regarding overview maps: - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, elsewhere ?) - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now overview maps visible on the GPS itself. The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should not do that.
..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar
--max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping Patrik
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
participants (3)
-
Gerd Petermann -
Patrik Brunner -
Steve Ratcliffe