I'm having problems on my Oregon with maps disappearing when I zoom in. Unfortunately, I can not establish what version of mkgmap I'm using as I'm , perhaps wrongly, justing extracting the contents of an mkgmap.zip into one folder. I notice there is not --help=version Would this be an idea? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm having problems on my Oregon with maps disappearing when I zoom in. Unfortunately, I can not establish what version of mkgmap I'm using as I'm , perhaps wrongly, justing extracting the contents of an mkgmap.zip into one folder.
I notice there is not --help=version
Would this be an idea?
If you just want to get the version number of your mkgmap installation you can get it with the command: java -jar mkgmap.jar --version WanMil
Thanks WanMil it works! -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734670.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Just realised --version doesn't seem to work for splitter. Any idea how I can obtain the version number? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734812.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
n Willink wrote
Just realised --version doesn't seem to work for splitter.
Any idea how I can obtain the version number?
This has to be implemented. Current splitter doesn't know its own version, in fact it still writes r171 to the pbf header. @Steve: I think it can be done in the same way as in mkgmap, but I don't know if the r171 in the pbf header is important ? Ciao, Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734816.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for that. There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp or img - it could be included in the copyright section? I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you?
I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56... Ciao, Gerd
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Thanks for your advise. I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself. By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don’t need splitter. I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers
There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you?
I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56... Ciao, Gerd
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email ml-node+s19327n5324443h20@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734841.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I mean overiding the priority of a gpx -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734842.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now. Gerd n Willink wrote
Thanks for your advise.
I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img
As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself.
By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap
Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don’t need splitter. I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG
From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers
There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you?
I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56...
Ciao, Gerd
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email
ml-node+s19327n5324443h20@.nabble
To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Gerd I’ve not seen that I’m afraid even in the lbl From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now. Gerd n Willink wrote Thanks for your advise. I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself. By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don’t need splitter. I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers
There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you?
I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56... Ciao, Gerd
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email] To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email ml-node+s19327n5324443h20@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you use gmaptool, and click on details, then you would see it... e.g. a sample output (makes me remember to change the sourcecode attribution from ccbysa to odbl..., something that should be done in trunk too...): File: D:/Garmin/openmtbmap/us-northeast/65310014.img, length 3437056 Header: 06.11.2012 17:44:37, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0 Mapset: US-Troy fat: 400h - 600h - 4600h, block 512 maps: 1, sub-files 5 Sub-file fat length 65310014 RGN 600h 1692620 65310014 TRE 2200h 7820 map 3e48d3e (65310014) date 06.11.2012 17:44:39 priority 31, parameters 1 4 23 0 levels [13,14,16,18,19,20,21,22,24], zoom [88,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0] N: 43.593750, S: 42.714844, W: -73.696289, E: -72.817383 OpenStreetMap and contributors www.openstreetmap.org Map data licenced under odbl http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ Map created with mkgmap-runknown Program released under the GPL 65310014 LBL 2400h 210838 CP 1252, Western European Sort 65310014 NET 2800h 389486 65310014 NOD 3000h 1117500 Map length s-f CP prio PID FID name 65310014 MPC 3418264 5 1252 31 End. On 08.11.2012 11:04, n Willink wrote:
Thanks Gerd I've not seen that I'm afraid even in the lbl *From:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=0> *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM *To:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=1> *Subject:* Re: version numbers Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now.
Gerd
n Willink wrote Thanks for your advise.
I'm looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img
As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps's version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself.
By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap
Currently, I'm encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don't need splitter. I've never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG
From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers
>
> There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present > there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp > or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you?
> > I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap > and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56...
Ciao, Gerd
> > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734845&i=0" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=2> To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this message in context: Re: version numbers <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- keep on biking and discovering new trails Felix openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org
Hi Felix Forgive me if I’m a bit slow but I can see the copyright and mapnumber,65310014 etc but where is the actual reference to the mkgmap’s version number? Was it say compiled using 2179,2370 or non of these? Even with the latest version of gmaptool I can’t see it . From: Felix Hartmann-2 [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 10:22 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers If you use gmaptool, and click on details, then you would see it... e.g. a sample output (makes me remember to change the sourcecode attribution from ccbysa to odbl..., something that should be done in trunk too...): File: D:/Garmin/openmtbmap/us-northeast/65310014.img, length 3437056 Header: 06.11.2012 17:44:37, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0 Mapset: US-Troy fat: 400h - 600h - 4600h, block 512 maps: 1, sub-files 5 Sub-file fat length 65310014 RGN 600h 1692620 65310014 TRE 2200h 7820 map 3e48d3e (65310014) date 06.11.2012 17:44:39 priority 31, parameters 1 4 23 0 levels [13,14,16,18,19,20,21,22,24], zoom [88,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0] N: 43.593750, S: 42.714844, W: -73.696289, E: -72.817383 OpenStreetMap and contributors www.openstreetmap.org Map data licenced under odbl http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ Map created with mkgmap-runknown Program released under the GPL 65310014 LBL 2400h 210838 CP 1252, Western European Sort 65310014 NET 2800h 389486 65310014 NOD 3000h 1117500 Map length s-f CP prio PID FID name 65310014 MPC 3418264 5 1252 31 End. On 08.11.2012 11:04, n Willink wrote: Thanks Gerd I’ve not seen that I’m afraid even in the lbl From: [hidden email] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: version numbers Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now. Gerd n Willink wrote Thanks for your advise. I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself. By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don’t need splitter. I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers > > There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present > there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp > or img - it could be included in the copyright section? Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you? > > I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap > and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different. What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56... Ciao, Gerd > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734845&i=0" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email] To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this message in context: Re: version numbers Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- keep on biking and discovering new trails Felix openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734853.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email ml-node+s19327n5324443h20@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734857.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Map created with mkgmap-runknown this is where it would be, had I compiled mkgmap with Linux.... On 08.11.2012 11:41, n Willink wrote:
Hi Felix Forgive me if I'm a bit slow but I can see the copyright and mapnumber,65310014 etc but where is the actual reference to the mkgmap's version number? Was it say compiled using 2179,2370 or non of these? Even with the latest version of gmaptool I can't see it . *From:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=0> *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 10:22 AM *To:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=1> *Subject:* Re: version numbers If you use gmaptool, and click on details, then you would see it...
e.g. a sample output (makes me remember to change the sourcecode attribution from ccbysa to odbl..., something that should be done in trunk too...): File: D:/Garmin/openmtbmap/us-northeast/65310014.img, length 3437056 Header: 06.11.2012 17:44:37, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0 Mapset: US-Troy fat: 400h - 600h - 4600h, block 512 maps: 1, sub-files 5
Sub-file fat length 65310014 RGN 600h 1692620 65310014 TRE 2200h 7820 map 3e48d3e (65310014) date 06.11.2012 17:44:39 priority 31, parameters 1 4 23 0 levels [13,14,16,18,19,20,21,22,24], zoom [88,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0] N: 43.593750, S: 42.714844, W: -73.696289, E: -72.817383 OpenStreetMap and contributors www.openstreetmap.org Map data licenced under odbl http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ Map created with mkgmap-runknown Program released under the GPL 65310014 LBL 2400h 210838 CP 1252, Western European Sort 65310014 NET 2800h 389486 65310014 NOD 3000h 1117500
Map length s-f CP prio PID FID name 65310014 MPC 3418264 5 1252 31
End. On 08.11.2012 11:04, n Willink wrote:
Thanks Gerd I've not seen that I'm afraid even in the lbl *From:* <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=0" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM *To:* <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=1" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email] *Subject:* Re: version numbers Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now.
Gerd
n Willink wrote Thanks for your advise.
I'm looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img
As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps's version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself.
By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap
Currently, I'm encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don't need splitter. I've never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG
From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers
>
> There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present > there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp > or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you?
> > I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap > and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56...
Ciao, Gerd
> > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html
To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734845&i=0" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=2" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email] To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, <A href="wlmailhtml:{970563C7-28FA-4C2E-B163-58995EF0D074}mid://00000048/" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" moz-do-not-send="true">click here. NAML <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this message in context: Re: version numbers <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734853&i=0" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- keep on biking and discovering new trails
Felix openmtbmap.org &www.velomap.org
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734853&i=1" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734853.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=2> To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this message in context: Re: version numbers <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734857.html> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- keep on biking and discovering new trails Felix openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org
On Thu, Nov 08, Felix Hartmann wrote:
Map created with mkgmap-runknown
this is where it would be, had I compiled mkgmap with Linux....
But only if you don't use --copyright-message and/or --license-file My build scripts adds the mkgmap version and date of data snapshot with --license-file. So that I always know with which data and mkgmap version the map was build. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Brilliant Many thank Thorsten ! I hadn’t added this to my commands but will do now! From: Thorsten Kukuk [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 10:50 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers On Thu, Nov 08, Felix Hartmann wrote:
Map created with mkgmap-runknown
this is where it would be, had I compiled mkgmap with Linux....
But only if you don't use --copyright-message and/or --license-file My build scripts adds the mkgmap version and date of data snapshot with --license-file. So that I always know with which data and mkgmap version the map was build. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734862.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email ml-node+s19327n5324443h20@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734864.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (6)
-
Felix Hartmann -
Gerd Petermann -
GerdP
-
n Willink -
Thorsten Kukuk -
WanMil