data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/729f8/729f8a5b5be67218942fc5c1b617a9ac4ece9dd8" alt=""
Hello, what is the state of "bounds" branch? It is still "work in progress"? I personally using this branch for awhile (r3309) and I noticed great improvement in bounds. Great work! best regards mira
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Mira, thanks for the feedback. Yes, it is stll work in progress. I first want to fix the errors that came up in trunk. This is from an email I wrote to Steve and WanMil on July 21, short before I did a longer cycle tour: "Reg. the bounds branch: The creation of preprocessed bounds is ~40% faster with the branch, it produces slightly smaller bnd files, also the BoundaryDiff tool is faster. I don't want to merge it now because I will not be awailable to fix problems. Reg. the small_first-v1.patch I noticed that the patch sometimes changes the produced img file, so it seems that the order matters, but I did not yet find the time to analyse the details. It also seems that the sorting doesn't always improve throughput, maybe this also depends on the kind of shapes (inner,outer?) I am using the Oregon area for testing as it contains complex mp-rels like 1414848. It seems that run time for this area is very unstable, I saw a range of 30 seconds for the same set of 10 input files, this is something else I want to analyse. " Gerd Jaromír Mikeš wrote
Hello,
what is the state of "bounds" branch? It is still "work in progress"? I personally using this branch for awhile (r3309) and I noticed great improvement in bounds. Great work!
best regards
mira _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/bounds-branch-tp5813741p5813749.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (2)
-
GerdP
-
Jaromír Mikeš