Re: [mkgmap-dev] Strange routing directions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4ac0/d4ac0179a29180730a367b1fffa2cd4e20235d9d" alt=""
Any ideas? Francisco On 12/20/2012 11:15 AM, Francisco Moraes wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed several times this but never remembered to email about it. My GPS always tells me to turn right on Park Village Dr when I am driving the full extent of it (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/18912622). There seems to be something near the intersection with Trents Wood Way where it always says turn right into PV Dr, even when coming from PV Dr itself. I've noticed similar instructions before, for example when travelling south on Miami Blvd into
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c125b/c125b853f0995d45aaac92eceb3ca5c1f81f52f5" alt=""
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 08:52:27AM -0500, Francisco Moraes wrote:
My GPS always tells me to turn right on Park Village Dr when I am driving the full extent of it (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/18912622). There seems to be something near the intersection with Trents Wood Way where it always says turn right into PV Dr, even when coming from PV Dr itself.
The map data looks mostly valid (JOSM Validator does not complain about unconnected junctions). East of Trent Woods way, the Park Village Drive is crossing the White Oak Creek (a waterway), but I do not think that this should affect the routing. There are not oneways either, and no turn restrictions (well, Davis Drive in the east is split to two oneways, but it looks normal practice). Have you tried other routing services in this area? Best regards, Marko
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/187bc/187bc34c8ecf7eca158f6aaf5e704c3d62a2b78a" alt=""
Hi, Am 22.12.2012 15:02, schrieb Marko Mäkelä: East of Trent Woods way, the Park Village Drive
is crossing the White Oak Creek (a waterway), but I do not think that this should affect the routing.
They are in the same layer. May be that's the problem. I would prefer to tag the section crossing the road with tunnel=yes and layer=-1 or the section of the road with bridge=yes and layer=1. In Bing it looks like a tunnel. Regards
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/023a9/023a9098d5847ef2b288898f55b229c476c05b2f" alt=""
El 22/12/12 16:03, Josef Latt escribió:
Hi,
Am 22.12.2012 15:02, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
East of Trent Woods way, the Park Village Drive
is crossing the White Oak Creek (a waterway), but I do not think that this should affect the routing.
They are in the same layer. May be that's the problem. I would prefer to tag the section crossing the road with tunnel=yes and layer=-1 or the section of the road with bridge=yes and layer=1. In Bing it looks like a tunnel. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use tunnel=culvert [1] in this case? [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/187bc/187bc34c8ecf7eca158f6aaf5e704c3d62a2b78a" alt=""
Am 24.12.2012 12:09, schrieb Carlos Dávila:
El 22/12/12 16:03, Josef Latt escribió:
Hi,
Am 22.12.2012 15:02, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
East of Trent Woods way, the Park Village Drive
is crossing the White Oak Creek (a waterway), but I do not think that this should affect the routing.
They are in the same layer. May be that's the problem. I would prefer to tag the section crossing the road with tunnel=yes and layer=-1 or the section of the road with bridge=yes and layer=1. In Bing it looks like a tunnel. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use tunnel=culvert [1] in this case? [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert
May be, should be decided by a local mapper. (tunnel=yes is better than nothing)
participants (4)
-
Carlos Dávila
-
Francisco Moraes
-
Josef Latt
-
Marko Mäkelä