The --remove-short-arcs option must go
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/802f4/802f43eb70afc2c91d48f43edac9b0f56b0ec4a4" alt=""
Hi Does anyone know for sure that if you do not supply this option, you get routing problems? I'm either going to make it the default (with --route) or remove it by the end of the day as it has been annoying me for years! ..Steve
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/148bb/148bbf24a78fac58e786394420a6dc6eabd796f5" alt=""
make it default. Otherwise very short sections, e.g. bridges with a intersection right behind it, will break! That's the case I remember. (don't want to dig it out from the archives). But without it, there will in very few cases be broken routing (and as shorter road parts, due to tagging get more often, then 2 years back when I discovered this glitch). On 26.11.2012 21:40, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know for sure that if you do not supply this option, you get routing problems?
I'm either going to make it the default (with --route) or remove it by the end of the day as it has been annoying me for years!
..Steve _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5978/c59786c096da1e4cdc11523b0019dec5fbb40792" alt=""
Hi, I once got a routing error with --remove-short-arcs (w/o value), since then i'm happy with --remove-short-arcs=3. Chris Am 26.11.2012 21:40, schrieb Steve Ratcliffe:
Hi
Does anyone know for sure that if you do not supply this option, you get routing problems?
I'm either going to make it the default (with --route) or remove it by the end of the day as it has been annoying me for years!
..Steve
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed4f2/ed4f2b5f66085b298deb2e8459f08b25909372d6" alt=""
In some cases, remove-short-arcs affect turn restriction relations, see this report https://github.com/maning/osmphgps/issues/48 I previously used a 5m removal. Maning Sambale (mobile) On Nov 27, 2012 7:06 AM, "Chris66" <chris66nrw@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi, I once got a routing error with --remove-short-arcs (w/o value), since then i'm happy with --remove-short-arcs=3.
Chris
Am 26.11.2012 21:40, schrieb Steve Ratcliffe:
Hi
Does anyone know for sure that if you do not supply this option, you get routing problems?
I'm either going to make it the default (with --route) or remove it by the end of the day as it has been annoying me for years!
..Steve
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/802f4/802f43eb70afc2c91d48f43edac9b0f56b0ec4a4" alt=""
Hi
In some cases, remove-short-arcs affect turn restriction relations, see this report https://github.com/maning/osmphgps/issues/48
OK understood. The short arcs need to be lengthened if they can't be removed without also removing important information. ..Steve
participants (4)
-
Chris66
-
Felix Hartmann
-
maning sambale
-
Steve Ratcliffe