It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404 What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries?
May I also add, most admin_level boundaries around my area use relations. How do I use a relation style to show admin level boundaries i.e. (or something similar) admin_level = 6-8 resolution 15 admin_level= 10-15 resolution 2o On 8/3/09, Lambertus <osm@na1400.info> wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------
--- Lun 3/8/09, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Da: maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> Oggetto: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries A: "Development list for mkgmap" <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Data: Lunedì 3 agosto 2009, 10:44 May I also add, most admin_level boundaries around my area use relations. How do I use a relation style to show admin level boundaries i.e. (or something similar) admin_level = 6-8 resolution 15 admin_level= 10-15 resolution 2o
Hi, I use this in my style: #boundaries boundary=administrative & admin_level<3 [0x1e resolution 14] boundary=administrative & admin_level<5 [0x1d resolution 16] boundary=administrative & admin_level<7 [0x1d resolution 20] boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14] It looks nice for Italy. Ciao, Marco.
On 8/3/09, Lambertus <osm@na1400.info> wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Marco, Does this work as a relation?
#boundaries
boundary=administrative & admin_level<3 [0x1e resolution 14] boundary=administrative & admin_level<5 [0x1d resolution 16] boundary=administrative & admin_level<7 [0x1d resolution 20] boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14]
It looks nice for Italy.
Ciao, Marco.
On 8/3/09, Lambertus <osm@na1400.info> wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------
don't see a reason why it shouldn't work for a relation for a relation you will need an entry in the relations file to copy tags to the lines and then process the rules for the lines an example I have been playing with for highways. a new tag route_ref is defined from the relation and applied to the line. in the line style you can use the usual syntax to use this tag. you can also use the usual tags. I just kept it on a special tag name to have the ref from the way and from the relation in different tags for flexible use # style/relations type=route & route=road { apply { add route_ref='${network} ${ref} ${direction}'; add route_ref='${network} ${ref}'; }} # style/lines highway=* {name '${route_name}' | '${route_ref} ${name}' | '${ref} ${name}' | '$ {name}'| '${ref}' } On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:30 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com>wrote:
Marco,
Does this work as a relation?
#boundaries
boundary=administrative & admin_level<3 [0x1e resolution 14] boundary=administrative & admin_level<5 [0x1d resolution 16] boundary=administrative & admin_level<7 [0x1d resolution 20] boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14]
It looks nice for Italy.
Ciao, Marco.
On 8/3/09, Lambertus <osm@na1400.info> wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Thanks! will try this tonight On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Apollinaris Schoell<aschoell@gmail.com> wrote:
don't see a reason why it shouldn't work for a relation for a relation you will need an entry in the relations file to copy tags to the lines and then process the rules for the lines an example I have been playing with for highways. a new tag route_ref is defined from the relation and applied to the line. in the line style you can use the usual syntax to use this tag. you can also use the usual tags. I just kept it on a special tag name to have the ref from the way and from the relation in different tags for flexible use
# style/relations type=route & route=road { apply { add route_ref='${network} ${ref} ${direction}'; add route_ref='${network} ${ref}'; }} # style/lines highway=* {name '${route_name}' | '${route_ref} ${name}' | '${ref} ${name}' | '$ {name}'| '${ref}' }
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:30 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:
Marco,
Does this work as a relation?
#boundaries
boundary=administrative & admin_level<3 [0x1e resolution 14] boundary=administrative & admin_level<5 [0x1d resolution 16] boundary=administrative & admin_level<7 [0x1d resolution 20] boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14]
It looks nice for Italy.
Ciao, Marco.
On 8/3/09, Lambertus <osm@na1400.info> wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------
Is it possible that someone moves the low level administrative boundaries to a higher zoomlevel in the default stylesheet? I know, I should submit a patch myself... Lambertus wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
participants (4)
-
Apollinaris Schoell -
Lambertus -
maning sambale -
Marco Certelli