Continue behaviour changed?
I just noticed that the recent changes to the style engine have broken my map. I think it's possibly down to me using 'continue' in these rules (that appear before the rules that generate the roads): highway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] railway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] highway=* & tunnel=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010e00 continue resolution 24] In the latest mkgmap, will these work as before? i.e. the bridge/tunnel lines will be generated without names and refs and the style engine will continue on to lower down my lines file where it will match rules for generating the routable roads (and the names/refs will be still around). Do I need any other keywords to make this work as before? Thanks, Mark
On 10/02/10 21:11, Mark Burton wrote:
I just noticed that the recent changes to the style engine have broken my map. I think it's possibly down to me using 'continue' in these rules (that appear before the rules that generate the roads):
highway=*& bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] railway=*& bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] highway=*& tunnel=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010e00 continue resolution 24]
In the latest mkgmap, will these work as before? i.e. the bridge/tunnel
Nothing will work 'as before' since it was kind of random what happened. It should now work in the intended manner. If you can give me the tags on the way, other relevant lines in the style, and the result you expect I can let you know if it is a bug or not. For a quick test, I get: WAY highway=p bridge=yes ref=A1 <<<lines>>> highway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] railway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] highway=* & tunnel=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010e00 continue resolution 24] highway=p & bridge=yes [0x2] <<<results>>> WAY 1: Line 0x10107, name=<null>, ref=<null>, res=24-24 (1/1),(2/2), WAY 1: Line 0x2, name=<A1>, ref=<A1>, res=24-24 (1/1),(2/2), Which sounds like the result you were wanting, yes? ..Steve
Hi Steve,
Nothing will work 'as before' since it was kind of random what happened. It should now work in the intended manner.
Good!
If you can give me the tags on the way, other relevant lines in the style, and the result you expect I can let you know if it is a bug or not.
For a quick test, I get:
WAY highway=p bridge=yes ref=A1
<<<lines>>>
highway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] railway=* & bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue resolution 24] highway=* & tunnel=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'int_ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010e00 continue resolution 24]
highway=p & bridge=yes [0x2]
<<<results>>> WAY 1: Line 0x10107, name=<null>, ref=<null>, res=24-24 (1/1),(2/2), WAY 1: Line 0x2, name=<A1>, ref=<A1>, res=24-24 (1/1),(2/2),
Which sounds like the result you were wanting, yes?
Err, yes. Sheepishly, I have to admit that the problem was of my own devising. Thanks anyway for the useful response. Cheers, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Burton -
Steve Ratcliffe