data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi all, I've now tested r3469 with an older germany download and a new one. Got no assertion and no severe error message, so please try as well. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/r3469-in-housenumber2-branch-tp5834295.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Bernd, thanks for testing. I am esp. interested in all special cases, so I am going to add more code to verify the results next week. Typical problem cases which are probably not handled well: - long unnamed service roads leading to multiple addresses - long roads connecting two or more villages. Often, numbering starts with 1 in each village, this leads to a lot of messages. - in small villages, I often see addr:street=<village-name> and many streets with name=<village-name>, but also a primary road road without a street name, e.g. B213. Houses close to this primary road are probably accessible from the primary road, but address search will not show that. I am not sure if that should be fixed in OSM or not. If you find other typical cases, please let me know. Gerd Bernd Weigelt wrote
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015, 20:15:08 schrieb Stéphane MARTIN:
Thank you Gerd !
Tested with r3471, seems to work ok, will test over the next days.
Bernd
-- amarok2 now playing: artist: The BossHoss title: My Favorite Game album: Rodeo Radio
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/r3469-in-housenumber2-branch-tp5834295p583436... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (3)
-
Bernd Weigelt
-
GerdP
-
Stéphane MARTIN