(After doing other things for a long time, I'm updating spliter, mkgmap, and data prepartory to building new img files.) I ran the mkgmap tests, and got some failures, 7 in args and 2 others. I am using NetBSD, but that shouldn't matter. Do people think "ant test" gets a clean pass with the current svn? If so I can send info about the failing tests. Thanks, Greg
Hi Greg, r4843 passes the tests, see https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mkgmap/mkgmap/build Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 16:39 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] do people think mkgmap tests pass? (After doing other things for a long time, I'm updating spliter, mkgmap, and data prepartory to building new img files.) I ran the mkgmap tests, and got some failures, 7 in args and 2 others. I am using NetBSD, but that shouldn't matter. Do people think "ant test" gets a clean pass with the current svn? If so I can send info about the failing tests. Thanks, Greg
Hi Greg, sorry, last trunk version was r4839, not r4843. Tests are only executed for trunk. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 16:44 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] do people think mkgmap tests pass? Hi Greg, r4843 passes the tests, see https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mkgmap/mkgmap/build Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022 16:39 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] do people think mkgmap tests pass? (After doing other things for a long time, I'm updating spliter, mkgmap, and data prepartory to building new img files.) I ran the mkgmap tests, and got some failures, 7 in args and 2 others. I am using NetBSD, but that shouldn't matter. Do people think "ant test" gets a clean pass with the current svn? If so I can send info about the failing tests. Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> writes:
sorry, last trunk version was r4839, not r4843. Tests are only executed for trunk.
Following up in public: The problem was that on my system, I had no "java" in $PATH. That's because pkgsrc has -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 78800 Dec 13 17:39 /usr/pkg/java/openjdk11/bin/java -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7712 Dec 13 18:20 /usr/pkg/java/openjdk8/bin/java and you are supposed to add one of those. I use the openjdk11 one when I run mkgmap, and I tend to like explicit config and not a choose-this-one symlink. I didn't notice because my build of ant is hard-wired to the openjd11 version, and "ant dist" just workd. It might be nice for the tests to somehow notice that there is no java. Or to ask ant what the path is? But I can see why nobody wants to spend the time to do that... With java in path (a symlink from $HOME/bin/java to the openjdk11 one, with $HOME/bin in $PATH), I get a clean pass on NetBSD 9 with openjdk11 from pkgsrc-2021Q4. Thanks for the hints. Greg
participants (2)
-
Gerd Petermann -
Greg Troxel