Commit: r1482: * Inner and outer tags are now considered. The last patches autogenerated the relationships which did make problems on tile boundaries if the multipolygon wasn't contained completely .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89f3c/89f3cdb012101f71b0b23c63028b42ab0a963b96" alt=""
Version 1482 was commited by steve on 2010-01-16 15:22:43 +0000 (Sat, 16 Jan 2010) BRANCH: mp * Inner and outer tags are now considered. The last patches autogenerated the relationships which did make problems on tile boundaries if the multipolygon wasn't contained completely . * Simple closing algorithm of polygons if they are not closed. This improves the handling on the tile boundaries. * Improved tag handling - WanMil + Fix tests
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8507/c8507a9b36d2ae012454d358e06b6320aac0fa43" alt=""
On 16.01.2010 16:22, svn commit wrote:
Version 1482 was commited by steve on 2010-01-16 15:22:43 +0000 (Sat, 16 Jan 2010) BRANCH: mp
* Inner and outer tags are now considered. The last patches autogenerated the relationships which did make problems on tile boundaries if the multipolygon wasn't contained completely . * Simple closing algorithm of polygons if they are not closed. This improves the handling on the tile boundaries. * Improved tag handling - WanMil
+ Fix tests _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
What about multipolygon patch v4 from yesterday. Should it be removed?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/802f4/802f43eb70afc2c91d48f43edac9b0f56b0ec4a4" alt=""
On 16/01/10 15:34, Felix Hartmann wrote:
What about multipolygon patch v4 from yesterday. Should it be removed?
That was patch v4, sorry if that wasn't clear. ..Steve
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/802f4/802f43eb70afc2c91d48f43edac9b0f56b0ec4a4" alt=""
On 16/01/10 17:20, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
On 16/01/10 15:34, Felix Hartmann wrote:
What about multipolygon patch v4 from yesterday. Should it be removed?
That was patch v4, sorry if that wasn't clear.
Oh well, it was meant to be patch v4... I will commit the rest of it now. ..Steve
participants (3)
-
Felix Hartmann
-
Steve Ratcliffe
-
svn commit