dropping place:village,hamlet,suburb in city search
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed4f2/ed4f2b5f66085b298deb2e8459f08b25909372d6" alt=""
Any suggested hexcode to use for place:village,hamlet,suburb in city search that will make it searcheable as a POI but not in the current city search? The idea is to declutter the city search of these minor places and just the actual city/town will be used to index streets and cities. -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c43df/c43df9cc4edc536b01f34bf1bdf12f0d54a2bbd5" alt=""
On Feb 19, 2011, at 7:08, maning sambale wrote:
Any suggested hexcode to use for place:village,hamlet,suburb in city search that will make it searcheable as a POI but not in the current city search?
I haven't yet had a thorough look at the code here, but from what I've seen, I get the impression that the POI hex codes in the style file have no effect on address search. I think the OSM pace tagging may be directly used for indexing. I could be wrong though. :-) Cheers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5978/c59786c096da1e4cdc11523b0019dec5fbb40792" alt=""
Am 19.02.2011 07:08, schrieb maning sambale:
The idea is to declutter the city search of these minor places and just the actual city/town will be used to index streets and cities.
There would be a disadvantage: I assume the assignment of streets to cities works by searching the nearest place-node. This works better if taking the village und suburbs into account because the density is higher. I'm a littlebit amused that nobody seems to fully understand the location-autofill algorithm. ;-) Sould look into the source code but java isn't my mother language... Chris
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c43df/c43df9cc4edc536b01f34bf1bdf12f0d54a2bbd5" alt=""
On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:14, Chris66 wrote:
I'm a littlebit amused that nobody seems to fully understand the location-autofill algorithm. ;-)
Well, I've been casually going through it, but I don't have much time. There are some interesting things there, including special handling for Germany, Switzerland, and Austria, as these countries seem to have good geonames coverage. Or something. :-) Cheers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e44cb/e44cb4f7e0092e7cf5766c42740c31f899660f49" alt=""
Am 19.02.2011 12:14, schrieb Chris66:
Am 19.02.2011 07:08, schrieb maning sambale:
The idea is to declutter the city search of these minor places and just the actual city/town will be used to index streets and cities. There would be a disadvantage:
I assume the assignment of streets to cities works by searching the nearest place-node.
This works better if taking the village und suburbs into account because the density is higher.
I'm a littlebit amused that nobody seems to fully understand the location-autofill algorithm. ;-)
Sould look into the source code but java isn't my mother language...
I think it's better to spend this time to find a way to get these informations from the border-polygon and not waste time to analyse suboptimal code. Henning
participants (4)
-
Chris66
-
Clinton Gladstone
-
Henning Scholland
-
maning sambale