Style Syntax for semi- or un-connected Lines
Hi, I seem to have difficulties to figure out the correct lines syntax to address semi- or un-connected lines. Using hgh:surface=Race & hgh:WayRel=yes & hgh:WayAcc != yes {set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none; set mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none} [0x10e05 level 0] still assigns 0x10e05 to roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815829699, although this is the only type definition assigning 0x10e05. Same for e. g. "set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=0x39" instead of "none". (Using Mkgmap version 4896 atm) Since documentation is quite sparse on this: Can somebody please help me out? Thanks, Felix
Hi Felix Your syntax looks correct, but, given that the example WAY you quote is a private driveway, I'd suspect the settings of hgh:*, being set to meet these conditions for the way in question and the road and wall Ticker On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 22:35 +0100, Felix Herwegh wrote:
Hi, I seem to have difficulties to figure out the correct lines syntax to address semi- or un-connected lines. Using
hgh:surface=Race & hgh:WayRel=yes & hgh:WayAcc != yes {set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none; set mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none} [0x10e05 level 0] still assigns 0x10e05 to roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815829699, although this is the only type definition assigning 0x10e05. Same for e. g. "set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=0x39" instead of "none". (Using Mkgmap version 4896 atm) Since documentation is quite sparse on this: Can somebody please help me out? Thanks, Felix
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Ticker, Thanks for your heads up on the syntax! During last night I started thinking, how tightly this feature must be connected to routing. Some very basic tests this morning, changing the primary type definition (0x10e05) to a routable type, hence seemed to make it work. Fortunately, on the other hand, not even mkgmap option --route seems to be required nevertheless; appreciated, because I use a separate map(layer) for routing ;-) Will follow up on this more thoroughly later and may revisit the topic, if the relief was premature ;-) Cheers, Felix On 06.03.23 10:17, Ticker Berkin wrote:
Hi Felix
Your syntax looks correct, but, given that the example WAY you quote is a private driveway, I'd suspect the settings of hgh:*, being set to meet these conditions for the way in question and the road and wall
Ticker
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 22:35 +0100, Felix Herwegh wrote:
Hi,
I seem to have difficulties to figure out the correct lines syntax to address semi- or un-connected lines.
Using
hgh:surface=Race & hgh:WayRel=yes & hgh:WayAcc != yes {set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none; set mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none} [0x10e05 level 0]
still assigns 0x10e05 to roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815829699, although this is the only type definition assigning 0x10e05. Same for e. g. "set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=0x39" instead of "none". (Using Mkgmap version 4896 atm)
Since documentation is quite sparse on this: Can somebody please help me out?
Thanks, Felix
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
participants (2)
-
Felix Herwegh -
Ticker Berkin