Hi Carlos, it depends on the style rules. The default style seems to avoid routing over highway=* with area=yes. I think the reason was that many ways tagged with area=yes are not suitable for routing, they would produce havy zig-zagging lines. A possible solution would be a new algo that collects the ways within such an area and the highway connected to it and then decides how to connect the ways without crossing any obstacles or leaving the area. This is not simple, but AFAIK there is a general solution for the problem. I don't plan to code it, maybe someone else has the time and energy... Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam@orangecorreo.es> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Dezember 2015 15:14 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian? Are all highway=* & area=yes really ignored for routing? There are plenty of cases of highway=residential & area=yes and I think they should be routable. I know way 109862652 should have a name tag (Plaza de los Bermejales as well) but if a way with the same name than addr:street already exists, shouldn't it be used for address search? El 11/12/15 a las 09:41, Gerd Petermann escribió:

Hi Carlos,

I think the problem is that the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110145380 is tagged with area=yes and therefore it is ignored for routing, means, it is not added as a road. Besides that highway=residential way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109862652 is not tagged with name=*.

Gerd

________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam@orangecorreo.es> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015 20:09 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian?

I have found several cases where mkgmap complains no road is found for a given address but there's a pedestrian highway with the correct name next to the address nodes/ways. See for example: 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2534468261 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246230812 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 6(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232406 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 7(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232873 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 9(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246233710 and way 110145380

_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev