data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Steve, this is more complex than I thought :-( If I got that right, the additional arcs to nodes on major roads in Garmin maps are always inter-section links. So, if I add them before calling RoadNetwork.splitCenters(), I have to remove those which are not inter-section links later. If I add them later, I can't be sure that the resulting route center satisfies the constraints. I have an algo that adds the arcs and nodeClass values, but it is done before splitting, so the additional arcs are likely not to be "inter-section links". Maybe this is the reason that the last route center is so big? Could this be a solution for my problem? Gerd
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Steve, forget it, I just found Garmin files which have additional arcs that are not inter-section links. My problem must be somewhere else... Gerd GerdP wrote
Hi Steve,
this is more complex than I thought :-( If I got that right, the additional arcs to nodes on major roads in Garmin maps are always inter-section links. So, if I add them before calling RoadNetwork.splitCenters(), I have to remove those which are not inter-section links later. If I add them later, I can't be sure that the resulting route center satisfies the constraints.
I have an algo that adds the arcs and nodeClass values, but it is done before splitting, so the additional arcs are likely not to be "inter-section links".
Maybe this is the reason that the last route center is so big? Could this be a solution for my problem?
Gerd
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/additional-arcs-tp5796737p5796740.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (2)
-
Gerd Petermann
-
GerdP