Hi,
I want to reproduce the problem, but I don't see a file with 1.9GB at this place: http://140.78.94.22/osm/ Where am I wrong? Gerd
Just saw, my email program messed up the format, so here once more in better readable form: Hi Gerd, sorry, i forgot to mention: I take the germany+.osm.xz (2.9GB) as input to xz.exe and pipe the output (~35GB) to osmconvert.exe and convert the stdin to germany+.osm.pbf. This file is about the same size around 1.9GB as the extract i made myself. Thanks for testing! Regards, Uli
Hi Uli, can please also tell me the splitter parms that you use? The speed and memory needs depends directly on the number and the position of the tiles. Gerd UliBär (Gmail) wrote
Hi,
I want to reproduce the problem, but I don't see a file with 1.9GB at this place: http://140.78.94.22/osm/ Where am I wrong? Gerd
Just saw, my email program messed up the format, so here once more in better readable form:
Hi Gerd,
sorry, i forgot to mention: I take the germany+.osm.xz (2.9GB) as input to xz.exe and pipe the output (~35GB) to osmconvert.exe and convert the stdin to germany+.osm.pbf. This file is about the same size around 1.9GB as the extract i made myself. Thanks for testing!
Regards, Uli
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-improvements-tp5735663p5735702.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (2)
-
GerdP -
UliBaer