[Patch v1] improve highway rules
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi all, I think the following lines shoud be added to the lines rules to make sure that these ways are not used for routing. For many of them I've tried to convince the mappers to find better tags, but without success so far. Some are part of proposals. # Remove highway tag from ways which are not suitable for routing highway=traffic_signals | highway=junction | highway=island | highway=centre_line | highway=traffic_island {delete highway} highway=piste | highway=ski {delete highway} highway=no | highway=none {delete highway} If I hear no complains I'll commit this patch on Monday. Gerd
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/771c9/771c937ae23e7d46c428847145f9010fd2043f00" alt=""
Gerd, I have no complaints. I am using my own style files I so ask where is the best place to insert these new rules? I assume they should be placed in my lines file ahead of the general highway processing rules. Does that make sense? Thanks Dave <https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Gerd Petermann < GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I think the following lines shoud be added to the lines rules to make sure that
these ways are not used for routing. For many of them I've tried to convince
the mappers to find better tags, but without success so far.
Some are part of proposals.
# Remove highway tag from ways which are not suitable for routing highway=traffic_signals | highway=junction | highway=island | highway=centre_line | highway=traffic_island {delete highway} highway=piste | highway=ski {delete highway} highway=no | highway=none {delete highway}
If I hear no complains I'll commit this patch on Monday.
Gerd
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Dave, Yes, I've attached a patch which shows where I'd place the rules in the default style. Gerd ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Dave Swarthout <daveswarthout@gmail.com> Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015 09:36 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] improve highway rules Gerd, I have no complaints. I am using my own style files I so ask where is the best place to insert these new rules? I assume they should be placed in my lines file ahead of the general highway processing rules. Does that make sense? Thanks Dave [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png]<https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> [http://static.avast.com/11/web/min/i/mkt/share/avast-logo.png]<https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Safe emailing | Avast Avast makes emailing safe. Let Avast scan everything you download from your incoming messages, so you don't have to worry about opening them. Free download Weitere Informationen...<https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, I think the following lines shoud be added to the lines rules to make sure that these ways are not used for routing. For many of them I've tried to convince the mappers to find better tags, but without success so far. Some are part of proposals. # Remove highway tag from ways which are not suitable for routing highway=traffic_signals | highway=junction | highway=island | highway=centre_line | highway=traffic_island {delete highway} highway=piste | highway=ski {delete highway} highway=no | highway=none {delete highway} If I hear no complains I'll commit this patch on Monday. Gerd _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
participants (2)
-
Dave Swarthout
-
Gerd Petermann