data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/802f4/802f43eb70afc2c91d48f43edac9b0f56b0ec4a4" alt=""
On 20/10/10 11:04, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
Are the .osm.bz2 and .osm.pbf files identical to begin with? Today, Geofabrik offers files with quite different timestamps:
portugal.osm.bz2 20-Oct-2010 00:20 13M portugal.osm.pbf 20-Oct-2010 07:17 7.1M
I can't speak for the equivalence of the geofabrik extracts, but for my recent test I downloaded the pbf and used osmosis to convert between the formats. You can use: osmosis --read-pbf foo.osm.pbf --write-xml foo.osm.gz osmosis --read-xml foo.osm.gz --write-pbf foo.osm.pbf I also do not doubt that the produced maps contain the same elements, its just that they are in a different order depending on the input file. Since my previous message I have discovered one reason why this might be so, but there is still more reasons to be found.
Is there a tool that converts .osm.bz2 and .osm.pbf to a canonical format? If there is, then you could compare the canonical formats to see if the files are truly equivalent.
Marko