Well, I think using nonroutable lines for routable types broke the address search (you tried to get somewhere that didn't exist for routing or so...). But I'm not sure what it was about exactly. I think it broke something because I remember I used 0x00 and 0x01 unroutable long time ago and stopped using it.. On the other hand, if 0x15 is routable without problems now, could this be true for all types? - Assuming the nonroutable types are actually routable, just mkgmap cannot create them routable??? On 02.05.2014 14:59, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Felix,
on the other hand, the test that prints the messages below may also be out-dated. I am no longer sure that the use of routable types for non-routable lines really breaks routing. I'll have to search the archives to find out why I've coded that test.
Gerd
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 14:56:10 +0200 From: extremecarver@gmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing
I know that a long time ago I tried 0x15 - and it would not route on my Vista HCx - but mind - that's a long time ago. Never tried id since... On 02.05.2014 14:54, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Minko,
yes, MapSource uses type 0x15 for routing. When I add it to the list of routable types --check-styles complains about other lines in your style: Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 296 Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 297 Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 298 Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 299 Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 341 Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 342 Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 345
So I am not sure if I should simply commit that. Does anybody else use type 0x15 for lines?
Gerd
> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 13:12:15 +0200 > From: ligfietser@online.nl <mailto:ligfietser@online.nl> > To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing > > Hi Gerd > Yes, seems 0x15 is routable. > > > > forgot to mention that --check-styles complains about line 266 in the > > lines file: > > highway=bridleway & bicycle!=yes & bicycle!=designated & > > bicycleroute!=yes & mtb_from_relation!=yes & mtb!=yes {add access = > > no; add foot = yes; set mkgmap:unpaved=1} [0x2915 road_class=0 > > road_speed=0 resolution 23] > > > > Type 0x2915 is in the overlays file : > > 0x2915: 0x15, 0x29 > > > > Do you think type 0x15 is routable? > > > > Gerd > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- keep on biking and discovering new trails
Felix openmtbmap.org &www.velomap.org <http://www.velomap.org>
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- keep on biking and discovering new trails Felix openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org