Re: [mkgmap-dev] Small holes in boundary coverage

9 Apr 2012

      Hi Gerd,

yes I think that should be possible.
AFAIK in method end() of class StyledConverter the first lines

Collection<List<RestrictionRelation>> lists = restrictions.values();
for (List<RestrictionRelation> l : lists) {
	for (RestrictionRelation rr : l) {
		rr.addRestriction(collector);
	}
}

must be changed in such a way that it is processed in a definite order.

WanMil
...
Hi WanMil,
okay, so let's assume the hook is working as it should.
Do you see a simple way to change the identical_output.patch so that the
turn restrictions are processed in a fixed order?
Gerd
...
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 21:51:45 +0200
From: wmgcnfg@web.de
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Small holes in boundary coverage
Hi Gerd,
I see a difference in the turn restrictions. It seems that they are not
added in sorted order.
I've printed out all elements passing the style converter. When printing
out the restrictions in a sorted order there is no more difference (in
my printout). So I assume that the binary output is also the same.
I am not sure why the difference does not appear in other tiles.
WanMil
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev