Hi I have this in my style: railway=abandoned & highway!=* & ((bicycle=* & bicycle!=no & bicycle!=proposed) | (foot=* & foot!=no & foot!=proposed)) {set highway=path} highway=path might be converted by later rules to bridleway, footway or cycleway Ticker On Sat, 2020-01-18 at 18:51 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi all,
the default style has this rule: # following really should be removed, but see: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2016q3/025104.html railway=abandoned [0x0a road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 22]
I agree with Ticker that it is not a good idea to make such a way routable. I would accept this when it has also a tag like bicycle=yes. I found a few ways like this, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122268824 (I wonder why nobody added a highway tag since 2011) BUT we should not assume access=yes for a railway=abandoned. So, what about this: railway=abandoned {add access=no} [0x0a road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 22]
Gerd _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev