data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/148bb/148bbf24a78fac58e786394420a6dc6eabd796f5" alt=""
I'm having problems compiling mkgmap with this patch... (trunk1 is my folder for the merge-roads branch). dunno really what's going on here... I only have jdk 7 installed (update 40) and uninstalled java jdk7 and jre7... C:\garmin\mkgmap_trunk1>ant dist Buildfile: C:\garmin\mkgmap_trunk1\build.xml prepare: ivy-availability: download-ivy: init-ivy: [ivy:configure] :: Ivy 2.2.0 - 20100923230623 :: http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ :: [ivy:configure] :: loading settings :: file = C:\garmin\mkgmap_trunk1\ivysetting s.xml resolve-compile: compile: [javac] Compiling 474 source files to C:\garmin\mkgmap_trunk1\build\classes [javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 1.6 [javac] C:\garmin\mkgmap_trunk1\src\uk\me\parabola\mkgmap\osmstyle\StyledCon verter.java:1751: error: diamond operator is not supported in -source 1.6 [javac] List<Way> dupIdHighways = new ArrayList<>(); [javac] ^ [javac] (use -source 7 or higher to enable diamond operator) [javac] 1 error [javac] 1 warning BUILD FAILED C:\garmin\mkgmap_trunk1\build.xml:237: Compile failed; see the compiler error ou tput for details. On 28.09.2013 14:35, WanMil wrote:
Hi Gerd,
in my opinion recalculating the highway counter after removing the short arcs should fix all problems, shouldn't it?
I've added three changes to the patch: 1. When calculating the highway count ways with duplicate id are not considered. This avoid that all points of a duplicated way are preserved by all filters. I think this should be modified a bit. For the first and last point of those ways the highway count should be increased and also all points where another way is connected. I have no use case where this matters but I think it is the "correct" counting?
2. I have added the problematic point in the error message of the MapBuilder in case a node is not a CoordNode. Just having the way id might not be enough information and the way also might have been merged.
3. I have moved the recalculation of the highway counters after the merge procedure. This should not change anything but it avoids a problem with merging...
WanMil
Hi Felix, WanMil,
attached is a patch that might solve the problem. I was still not able to reproduce it, so it's just a guess: In a special case, we create a new Coord instance to replace a CoordPOI instance. This new instance has highway count = 0. A very special case might be that this point is later used to split the way, in that case it would have highwaycount=1 for a first or last point of a road. The patch increments the count when the coord is created.
Gerd
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:51:58 +0200 From: extremecarver@gmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway count not fixed yet... - merge-roads-branch
no, I don't use any roundabout command like options, but adjust turn headings?? -- see below for all commandline options. From style I don't call much except loads of continues and continue with action, as well as some link to pois stuff like reduce road_class/road_speed.
On the old version the only very occasional problem note I get is the following - in this case for Bayern (Germany Bundesland) Geofabrik extract: start compilation 21:45:44 Velomap bayern this is run58 SEVERE (MapBuilder): c:\openmtbmap\maps\65260023.osm.pbf: possible routing problem: road end-points not both coordNodes: (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/156936823) SEVERE (MapBuilder): c:\openmtbmap\maps\65260023.osm.pbf: possible routing problem: road end-points not both coordNodes: (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/156936823)
I'm using theese commandline options: start /low /b /wait java -jar -Xms6000M -Xmx10300M c:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar %max-jobs% %generate-sea% %precomp-seaxx% %style-file% --nsis %indx% %levels% --adjust-turn-headings --add-pois-to-areas --reduce-point-density=3.4 --reduce-point-density-polygon=6 --housenumbers --remove-short-arcs --link-pois-to-ways --ignore-turn-restrictions --polygon-size-limits="24:16, 23:14, 22:12, 21:11, 20:10, 19:9, 18:8, 17:7, 16:6, 15:5, 14:4, 13:3, 12:2, 11:0, 10:0" --description=openmtbmap_%abr% --show-profiles=1 %locationxx% --route --country-abbr=%abr% --country-name=%country% --mapname=%FID%0000 --family-id=%FID% --product-id=1 --series-name=openmtbmap_%country%_%date% --family-name=mtbmap_%abr%_%date% --tdbfile --overview-mapname=mapsetc --keep-going --area-name="%country%_%date%_openmtbmap.org" -c c:\openmtbmap\maps\template.%countryx% 7*.img >NUL
with these variables in general: set generate-sea=--generate-sea --latin1 set precomp-seaxx=--precomp-sea=c:\openmtbmap\maps\sea.zip set levels=--levels="0:24, 1:23, 2:22, 3:21, 4:20, 5:19, 6:18" --overview-levels="7:17, 8:16, 9:15, 10:14, 11:13, 12:12
and for most countries: set indx=--index (not using index for Asia continent as asia continent with index was crashing in Basecamp/Mapsource very often, only few compiles actually worked) set max-jobs=--max-jobs=8 (for some countries 7 as I ran out of memory on them and server started to swap=slower) On 26.09.2013 21:57, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi WanMil,
at least we should know if options like frig-roundabout are used. Afaik the default style will never touch these routines. I guess Felix uses almost all.
Gerd
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:53:20 +0200 > From: wmgcnfg@web.de <mailto:wmgcnfg@web.de> > To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway count not fixed yet... - merge-roads-branch > > Yeah, I guess it should be possible to simplify them be > reimplementation. But that's only a rough guess.... > > A test case would be great to find the missing incHighwayCount()! > > > Hi WanMil, > > > > yes, first and last node should be coordNode, so the assert is ok. > > Unfortunately, the data flow in StyledConverter is > > so complex that it is difficult to say why the assertion is triggered. I > > guess one of the split routines is still > > missing a call of incHighwayCount(). > > > > Gerd > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:42:28 +0200 > > > From: wmgcnfg@web.de <mailto:wmgcnfg@web.de> > > > To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > > > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway count not fixed yet... - > > merge-roads-branch > > > > > > Yes, it is meant to reduce the number of CoordNodes because that should > > > reduce the size of the routing network and might have a positive impact. > > > > > > The assertion reported by Felix seems to be a problem of the highway > > > count. The assertion checks if the first node of a MapRoad is a > > > CoordNode. I think this is required, isn't is? > > > While writing I am thinking of no exit roads. What about these roads? I > > > think the first and the last point should also be a CoordNode?!? > > > > > > WanMil > > > > > > > Hi WanMil, > > > > > > > > yes, it will not cause problems. On the other hand, if you do it to > > > > reduce the number of CoordNodes, we should try to have a correct > > > > counter. I think the short-arc-removal is not always correctly > > > > maintaining it. I'll have a look at it tomorrow. > > > > > > > > Gerd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WanMil wrote > > > >> Hi Gerd, > > > >> > > > >> decHighwayCount() is called only on the node where two roads are > > merged. > > > >> So assuming that the highway count gives the number of connected roads > > > >> calling this method in such a case should be ok. > > > >> > > > >> WanMil > > > >> > > > >>> Hi WanMil, > > > >>> > > > >>> reg. the highway count: > > > >>> I guess you already noticed, but just to make sure: > > > >>> In trunk the absolute value of the counter does not really matter > > > >>> as long as it is > 1 for each point that should be converted to a > > > >>> node. I think a lot of routines are calling > > > >>> incHighwayCount() "just to make sure", so a node where two > > > >>> arcs meet might have a counter > 2. > > > >>> You have introduced decHighwayCount(), so now > > > >>> each place where this counter is incremented has > > > >>> to be double checked. > > > >>> > > > >>> Gerd > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> WanMil wrote > > > >>>> Ok, but I need some food (style, data etc.) to reproduce it... > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Just cannot find the topic on the merge-roads-branch. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Is it known that the highway count error is not fully fixed yet? I > > > >>>>> still > > > >>>>> get loads of them. > > > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > >>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> mkgmap-dev@.org <mailto:mkgmap-dev@.org> > > > >>> > > > >>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > >>> > > > >>>> mkgmap-dev@.org <mailto:mkgmap-dev@.org> > > > >>> > > > >>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> View this message in context: > > > >>> > > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/highway-count-not-fixed-yet-merge-roads-branc... > > > >>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> mkgmap-dev@.org <mailto:mkgmap-dev@.org> > > > > > > > >>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > > > > > >> mkgmap-dev@.org <mailto:mkgmap-dev@.org> > > > > > > > >> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context: > > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/highway-count-not-fixed-yet-merge-roads-branc... > > > > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > > > > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > > > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev