data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95c1c/95c1cba41c7d0991456384ffa8af010161a633d7" alt=""
Op 23-04-11 10:42, Henning Scholland schreef:
Hi Minko Might it be an fault in OSM-data? In Germany junction=roundabout imply oneway=yes. I don't know exactly how this is handled in other countries, but I won't be surprised, if this is globally implied. So if there is an roundabout, which isn't an oneway, you should add an oneway=no.
Henning
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev I might add that I suspect Ligfietser (=recumbent cyclist) is talking about cycleway roundabouts (or cycleways that circle a roundabout). Many of these (at least in the Netherlands) allow cyclists to take the roundabout in both directions.
So, yes, for cars roundabouts will be oneways mostly everywhere, but not necessarily for cyclists or pedestrians. I also note that the wiki tagging page suggests that oneway=yes is implied, so it follows that every non-oneway roundabout should be tagged oneway=no?