Hi Gerd, On Mon, Apr 02, GerdP wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
attached is a patch for the problem reported here:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Bug-in-splitter-tp5610856p5610856.html
I don't have the data nor the machine to test it, so I tried to find all places were nodes are counted and changed the variables to long.
Thanks, at least for me it's working now.
I did not find a good explanation for the small difference in the numbers: osmconvert reported 2518069911 nodes, which is ~ 2.518.069.911 -(2^31 - 1) = 370.586.264 - 2^31 + 370.586.264 =* -1.776.897.384* but splitter r200 reported * -1.776.905.107* nodes The formatting routine is not the reason. Any ideas?
The SRTM data has some duplicate nodes (duplicate as of same lat/lon, but different ID). Does one of the tools ignore them? At least mkgmap warns about them. Else no, I have no idea. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)