Hallo Gerd, On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 03:54:14PM +0200, Gerd Petermann wrote:
just to make sure: The example shows a no_u_turn restriction where "from" way and "to" way are equal and a via node is used.
Are that the criteria which should tell mkgmap to emit an info and ignore the restriction?
Why not a warning? I'd say all correct restriction relations which are ignored should produce a warning.
Yes, this is a restriction=no_u_turn, with the same way in role=to and role=from, and one of the way endpoints being the role=via node. You are right, it could be a warning as well. The warning message should mention the restriction type and that the from,to ways are equal. The warning could then be filtered out with a grep -vf script (as long as it is for restriction=no_u_turn), or the map data could be reviewed and edited, possibly after consulting the mapper, the wiki, or the applicable 'authorities'. Marko PS: Yesterday and today I addressed most warnings from via-ways -r3143 for Finland. Tomorrow it should complain very little. I left this no_u_turn relation unchanged.