Hi all, is anybody out there how is interested in the results for b13,b14, and b19? Up to now (r4118) results of both is_in(landuse,residential,any) and is_in(landuse,residential,all) are more or less unpredictable for these cases. Here are some real world examples (building is inner ring in landuse=residential MP): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637318545 (calculated result is IN) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333231967 (calculated result is OUT) Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Januar 2020 07:52 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] is_in test cases v4 Hi all, I've added a few more special cases and changed b18 to expected=? The case with w45 (spike in landuse=residential polygon) is not yet working, but I assume I will simply ignore it. Gerd