Dermot McNally schreef:
With the merge back into trunk, should I expect that the support there is identical to that on the multipolygon branch? [...] but if I process it using trunk code I get a mostly flooded map.
Anybody else seeing such differences?
Actually, I don't use the --sea-... option anymore, as there are a couple of tiles in the Netherlands flooded. This could the result of splitting (but I'm not entirely sure). It is *not* the geofabric cutout that is at fault, as one of these flooded tiles is in the centre of my map (but borders with http://osm.org/go/0E6W1PA_- so could still be a cutoff problem. I wrote about this before (17-09-09 12:12). I did not test the multipoligon branch - but I'm willing to do that; is there a rough outline of how to use svn branches here? (I'm perfectly able to compile and patch, I just never used svn branches before). So basically, for trunk, I leave the sea-polygon thing out, I'd rather not swim to Utrecht ;) V.