data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d78f/0d78f38077a2f8d435eb75b37ffab5d5fb801683" alt=""
Hi Valentijn,
First, a remark. Since the oneway=yes/cycleway=opposite roads have "(cycleway)" attached to their names, a GPS unit will randomly show either the regular name, or the (cycleway) name. Which isn't too bad for testing, I'd suggest you leave it this way until we're set and done with it, because now you can see *why* a certain road is accessible or inaccessible (i.e. it tells you where you're driving). Namely, here's one occasion where it came in handy:
Yes, that could be considered a "feature".
Yesterday I drove by car to one of those "cycleway=opposite" ways and to my surprise, my Garmin told me to turn right to "Hembrugstraat (cycleway)". I'm absolutely sure that the unit was set to "car" and not bike. So is there a bug in the opposite-way-code? (Or is this the strange idea of a Garmin that you can route the wrong way for some meters??) I had another Garmin unit with me with a regular Garmin map, that showed the right route; also, the route is nothing special, just about this: http://www.yournavigation.org/?flat=52.392997&flon=4.871082&tlat=52.391864&t...
Any ideas? (I'll recheck the routing later on, to see if this will also happen with positions further away in one-way-streets).
I think that (at least with mapsource) the routing restrictions are considered "advisory" at times rather than absolute prohibitions. If you start a route close to a road that has a synthesised cycleway I can quite believe that the gps would "grab" the cycleway instead of the road. If it routes down the cycleway from another way and a road is also available at the same point, that's not good. Cheers, Mark