Hi Andrzej

Thanks for that.

However,

I find that Transparency still allows for DEM to be visible on the other maps I create.

Interesting about the DEM having 5 layers and only 4 layers in my data

Again , this normally doesn't cause a problem but it is an issue.

I only include the dem files in the tdb when I upload the map to my device. Basecamp doesn't seem to complain.

My point was , that for some strange reason the .hgt file needed for this area gets ignored by BuildDEMfile , but not always - see below

Maps anywhere else don't cause a problem -

@ Frank

1) if I add dem files to kent-latest1.osm.pbf from, Geofabrik the 'missing' .hgt file gets included and the whole of Kent displays  DEM

2)  If I use the small map OR 68775599.osm.pbf then the problem happens only the top part gets DEM - see picture

It perhaps has something to do with having to include a sea .hgt

r

Nick


On 23/11/2017 13:00, Andrzej Popowski wrote:
Hi Nick,

there are several problems with your map.

You have created a transparent map without background. I think background object 0x4A is needed for DEM shading.

You have created DEM with 5 layers, while you got only 4 layers of data in your map. Programs probably won't accept DEM with excessive number of DEM layers.

TDB of your map doesn't contain references to DEM.