Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the contribution - it sounds like a good idea.
One thought, how about using words and not numbers, words are easier to interpret when you come back to them 3 months (5 minutes?) later. So you could have something like:
ignore-maxspeeds (same meaning as now for compatibility but we could retire it in the future)
but then have a new option that gives the flexibility you want:
maxspeed=ignore (use speed defined in roadclass) maxspeed=heed (use maxspeed if defined, roadclass otherwise) maxspeed=lowest (use lowest of those speeds) maxspeed=highest (use highest of those speeds - why not?)
Cheers,
Mark
I'll change it. The original intention was to avoid creating another option (as I'd seen some comment about "yet another option"). But I'm happy to go down that route.