data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/771c9/771c937ae23e7d46c428847145f9010fd2043f00" alt=""
Gerd, I have no complaints. I am using my own style files I so ask where is the best place to insert these new rules? I assume they should be placed in my lines file ahead of the general highway processing rules. Does that make sense? Thanks Dave <https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/lp-safe-emailing?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Gerd Petermann < GPetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I think the following lines shoud be added to the lines rules to make sure that
these ways are not used for routing. For many of them I've tried to convince
the mappers to find better tags, but without success so far.
Some are part of proposals.
# Remove highway tag from ways which are not suitable for routing highway=traffic_signals | highway=junction | highway=island | highway=centre_line | highway=traffic_island {delete highway} highway=piste | highway=ski {delete highway} highway=no | highway=none {delete highway}
If I hear no complains I'll commit this patch on Monday.
Gerd
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com