data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4826a/4826a6e253d209ef7bfec1e7e2b9cb45cbb8ac01" alt=""
On 12/10/13 08:05, Henning Scholland wrote:
tag is missing? Eg. mkgmap:ref = <empty>. Should then the 1st one stay empty as well or should this field filled with mkgmap:name?
Yes if there is no ref then the plain name would be the first entry in the map file and any other entries would be moved up.
If there are no issues with Garmin, I would prefer let the missing ones stay empty. So it's quite clear and constant which tag is associated with which field.
Yes, it would probably be best to have the mkgmap entries empty, rather than loads of logic to shuffle them around. I think however that empty ones would have to be dropped when written to the file.
..Steve
So the order to set the labels might be: mkgmap:ref mkgmap:name mkgmap:name:1 mkgmap:name:2 mkgmap:name:3 ... The first four of the tags that are set are used. I think the following behaviour makes sense: If mkgmap:name is not set then the name tag is used? The name action adds the mkgmap:name tag instead of settings the name in the java element? I wonder if it is easier for style devs to set one mkgmap:addname separated with ";" instead of setting mkgmap:name:1..n? WanMil