Hi Alexandre, okay, let's see what the users say about the test in r440. Gerd ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Alexandre Loss <alexandre.loss@gmail.com> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. November 2016 13:19:53 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r440 released Hi Gerd, When I first started using Splitter, I experienced this overlapping tiles problem and can confirm that it causes routing problem at tile boundaries. I agree with this test, but I have doubt whether the best solution would be to stop Splitter or simply issue a warning message. In principle, I suggest that the test only generate a warning. Alexandre 2016-11-16 9:31 GMT-02:00 Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com>>: Hi all, I've fixed a major bug in splitter which results in wrong output files when you pass a --split-file which contains overlapping areas. See also http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=splitter&rev=440 Splitter doesn't generate such a file, but one can create such a file in an editor (intended or accidentially) I am not sure what happens when you create a gmapsupp with overlapping tiles, I'd expect problems with routing at the tile boundaries. So, I think splitter should stop when overlaps between tiles with the same mapid prefix are found, e.g. overlapping tiles 63240010 and 63240013 are not allowed, while overlapping tiles 12340001 and 43210001 would be considered okay. I've not yet implemented this test, what do you think about it? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/splitter-r440-released-tp5885986.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev