data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Henning Scholland wrote
Hi Gerd, r236 works fine for planet. Log: http://www.aighes.de/data/mkgmap.zip Yes, that really looks much better than the previous logs. The changes in the run times for the diverse passes meet my assumptions. I guess you have also verified the missing fairy lines do appear now in 11000004 ? Yes, they are fine now.
Good to hear :-)
Henning Scholland wrote
Another thought: What about only analysing the ways, if they cross/leave a tile and keep them in mind. Afterwards read all relations and check, if they contains a way, which is kept in mind. So relations must not be builded to, but only the needed relations would be in the tile. I think this would not detect MP that enclose a tile (without having any way or point in it or crossing it). Hmm...yes, you're right. It's very tricky: rels with type=boundary should only be in the tiles, there they have a way in and type=multipolygon should be in each tile, the area is touching.
Hmm, so we would write complete relation if they have type=multipolygon, but allow incomplete relations if type=boundary ? For the latter I would just make sure that the ways that are crossing the tile are complete. Sounds reasonable to me. Any objections? Ciao, Gerd